IPv4-IPv6 Impact on IoT

Authors

  • M.S. Rekha Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RL Jalappa Institute of Technology, Doddaballapur, Karnataka, India
  • Sunanda Dixit Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RL Jalappa Institute of Technology, Doddaballapur, Karnataka, India
  • Manjunatha B.N. Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RL Jalappa Institute of Technology, Doddaballapur, Karnataka, India
  • Maraka Gowthami Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RL Jalappa Institute of Technology, Doddaballapur, Karnataka, India.

Keywords:

IPv4, IPv6, IoT, Transition Techniques, protocols

Abstract

The most important phase in web communication in Internet is, that each computer connected must have an identifiable number which is called as IP. IP, Internet Protocol address is a unique Id assigned to each device. This study explains the impact on IoT on transition from IPv4 to IPv6. In general, we have two versions of IP which are used world widely on the Internet. IPv4 is the first version that is used widely in most of the websites on the Internet. It has a 32-bit size and can hold up to 2^32 numbers. IPv4 has a limited number of IP addresses which could not reach the demands and requirements of modern technologies and security access. Thus, being replaced by latest version, which is IPv6, contains 128-bit size and can hold up to 2^128 numbers. It helps in increasing capacity and security. As for these advantages, IPv6 plays an important role in development of IoT mainly due to its complex nature and space. Some of the transition techniques are Dual-Stack, Tunneling and NAT-PT. In this study we will be comparing these various techniques and derive the best technique for performing transition.

References

Shiranzaei A, Khan RZ. Internet protocol versions—A review. In 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom). 2015 Mar 11; 397–401.

Shah H. Comparing TCP-IPv4/TCP-IPv6 Network Performance. Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia; 2013.

Anand A, Jaqualin, Nimmy, Sonali, Amrutha, Hega, et al. Transition Mechanisms from IPv4 to IPv6 Addresses. J Web Eng Technol. 2016; 3(2): 21–7.

Minoli D, Kouns J. Security in an IPv6 Environment. New York: CRC Press; 2008.

Grayeli P, Sarkani S, Mazzuchi T. Performance analysis of ipv6 transition mechanisms over mpls. Int J Commun Netw Inf Secur. 2012 Aug 1; 4(2): 91–103.

Al-hamadani, Lencse G. Survey on the performance analysis of IPv6 transition technologies. Acta Tech Jaurinensis. 2021; 14(2): 186–211.

Ibáñez Parra J. Comparison of IPv4 and IPv6 Networks Including Concepts for Deployment and Interworking. In INFOTECH Seminar Advanced Communication Services (ACS). 2014; 1–13.

Ghumman FA. Effects of IPV4/IPv6 Transition Methods in IoT (Internet of Things): A survey. Available at SSRN 3402664. 2019 May 17.

Ravi Kumar CV, et al. Performance Analysis of IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Methods. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016 May; 9(20): 01–08. ISSN: 0974-6846.

Parker C. (2019). What is IPv4/IPv6 Dual Stack? WhatIsMyIPAddress. [Online] Available from: https://whatismyipaddress.com/dual-stack.

El Khadiri K, Labouidya O, Elkamoun N, Hilal R. Performance evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms for real-time applications using OPNET modeler. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2018; 9(4): 387–392.

El Idrissi D, Elkamoun N, Hilal R. Study of the impact of the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 based on the tunneling mechanism in mobile networks. Procedia Computer Science. 2021 Jan 1; 191: 207–14.

Published

2023-09-12