Enhancing Healthcare Record Modeling Through Graph Convolutional Networks: Overcoming Challenges and Advancing Data Management and Analysis

Authors

  • Swathi Yalavarthy Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Tirumala Engineering college, Narasaropet, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • P.V. S. Lakshmi Jagadamba Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Gayatri Vidya Parishad College of Engineering for Women, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

Electronic Health Records (EHR), Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), Healthcare Data Modeling, Disease Prediction, Treatment Recommendation

Abstract

Modeling healthcare records data as a graph database presents various challenges due to the complex nature of healthcare information and its interconnectedness. In this research endeavor, our primary objective is to pinpoint the major obstacles within this field and present potential remedies to tackle them effectively. By leveraging machine learning techniques, we aim to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of healthcare record modeling, facilitating better data management and analysis. One suitable algorithm for addressing these challenges is the Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). GCN is a deep learning algorithm that operates on graph-structured data, making it well-suited for modeling healthcare records represented as a graph database. GCN allows information propagation between interconnected nodes, capturing the dependencies and relationships within the data. To apply GCN to healthcare record modeling, we can represent patient records as nodes in the graph, with edges indicating various relationships, such as diagnoses, treatments, and patient demographics. The algorithm can then learn the node embeddings, which encode the underlying features of each record, by propagating and aggregating information through the graph. The proposed GCN algorithm can address several challenges in modeling healthcare records as a graph database. Firstly, it can handle the heterogeneous nature of healthcare data by capturing different types of nodes and edges. Additionally, GCN demonstrates a strong capability to capture data dependencies and patterns, enhancing the precision of predictions and recommendations. Additionally, the algorithm can handle missing or incomplete data by leveraging the information from neighboring nodes. We can overcome the challenges associated with modeling healthcare records data as a graph database by utilizing machine learning algorithms such as GCN. These advancements can improve the management and analysis of healthcare data, leading to better patient care, efficient resource allocation, and more informed decision-making in the healthcare domain.

References

Beale T, Heard S, Kalra D, Lloyd D, Terenziani P. The good European health record project. Int J Med Inform. 1995; 47(1–2): 169–178.

Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. New Engl J Med. 2019; 380(14): 1347–1358.

Hirsch G, Homer J, Evans E. A system dynamics model for planning cardiovascular disease interventions. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(4): e33–e42.

Jiang G, Solbrig HR, Chute CG, Tao C. A knowledge graph-based approach to clinical trial recruitment. J Biomed Inform. 2019; 92: 103134.

Sittig DF, Singh H. Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013; 10(Fall): 1c.

Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, Legare F, et al. A systematic review of factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of information and communication technologies. J Med Syst. 2012; 36(1): 241–277.

Kruse CS, Kristof C, Jones B, Mitchell E, Martinez A. Barriers to electronic health record adoption: a systematic literature review. J Med Syst. 2016; 40(12): 252.

Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. HITECH Act drove significant gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff. 2016; 35(4): 661–668.

Kierkegaard P, Kaushal R. Electronic health record implementation: a review of resources and tools. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019; 31(6): 796–802.

Li Y, Yu S, Li Q, Zhang Z. Graph convolutional networks for electronic health record analysis: A survey. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022; 26(2): 476–490.

Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Electronic health records: Then, now, and in the future. Telemat Inform. 2017; 34(7): 1369–1375.

Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhao L, Zhang J. Patient representation learning with graph convolutional networks for disease prediction using electronic health records. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022; 26(9): 2572–2582.

Chen Y, Zhang Z, Wang F. Temporal graph convolutional network for predicting disease progression from electronic health records. IEEE Trans Big Data. 2021; 7(3): 1294–1304.

Huang Z, Wang J, Chen Q, Sun Y. Graph convolutional networks for healthcare: A systematic review. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 33987–34001.

Liu X, Chen H, Zeng D, Li Y. Multimodal graph convolutional networks for predicting patient condition trajectories using electronic health records. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020; 24(12): 3431–3440.

Zhou Z, Chen S, Zhang Y. A graph convolutional network-based framework for predicting adverse drug events from electronic health records. IEEE Trans Big Data. 2020; 6(2): 303–313.

Li Y, Yu S, Chen S, Zhang Z. Heterogeneous graph attention network for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019; 23(6): 2421–2428.

Kipf T. (2016 Sep 30). Graph Convolutional Networks. Retrieved July 6, 2023, from https://tkipf.github.io/graph-convolutional- networks/?ref=inference

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

[1]
S. . Yalavarthy and P.V. S. Lakshmi Jagadamba, “Enhancing Healthcare Record Modeling Through Graph Convolutional Networks: Overcoming Challenges and Advancing Data Management and Analysis”, JoSETTT, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 39–50, Sep. 2023.